On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Evan Laforge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inclusion in the official Data.Binary would be nice, especially if it
could be a drop-in replacement, say by changing the Data.Binary
instance definitions to Strict.Binary or something.
I have a class defined to abstract
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Bryan O'Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you provide Applicative and Alternative instances for your getter
monads (perhaps you already do?)
I have Alternative instances, and they're used a fair bit in my HTTP
parser (network-minihttp). You're right that I
OK, so today I tried to write my first program using the Binary library.
And I've hit a snag: It appears the library will only handle data that
is byte-aligned. So if I try to write three Bool values, it uses three
bytes, not three bits.
Before I sit down and spend 3 months designing my own
dominic.steinitz:
OK, so today I tried to write my first program using the Binary library.
And I've hit a snag: It appears the library will only handle data that
is byte-aligned. So if I try to write three Bool values, it uses three
bytes, not three bits.
Before I sit down and spend 3
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Dominic Steinitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, so today I tried to write my first program using the Binary library.
And I've hit a snag: It appears the library will only handle data that
is byte-aligned. So if I try to write three Bool values, it uses three
Dominic Steinitz wrote:
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/binary-strict
Ooo... looks interesting. Pity I can't look at any documentation for it.
(Is that *really* Haddoc failing with a parse error on a pragma? Surely
not...) I'll take a look at this.
Thanks.
agl:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Dominic Steinitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, so today I tried to write my first program using the Binary library.
And I've hit a snag: It appears the library will only handle data that
is byte-aligned. So if I try to write three Bool values, it uses
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you recommend binary-strict over bitsyntax now?
Or are none yet entirely satisfactory
Probably, yes. Bitsyntax was, after all, the first Haskell code I ever
wrote :) It works, but I think the monad style of
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Andrew Coppin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dominic Steinitz wrote:
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/binary-strict
Ooo... looks interesting. Pity I can't look at any documentation for it. (Is
that *really* Haddoc failing with a parse
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Adam Langley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you recommend binary-strict over bitsyntax now?
Or are none yet entirely satisfactory
Probably, yes. Bitsyntax was, after all, the first Haskell
Don Stewart wrote:
dominic.steinitz:
OK, so today I tried to write my first program using the Binary library.
And I've hit a snag: It appears the library will only handle data that
is byte-aligned. So if I try to write three Bool values, it uses three
bytes, not three bits.
Before I sit
11 matches
Mail list logo
