On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Stephen Tetley
stephen.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
What is the state-of-the-practice in type-level programming?
I know Günther started this thread about monads, but I seem to
remember him having a long running problem with typeful database
programming,
Dan Piponi wrote:
Günther,
A shining example are Dan Piponis blog posts.
When you get stuck, post a comment saying where so that I can learn
what people find difficult.
On the other hand, I understand how intangible not-understanding can
be, so it can be hard to point to where the
Hi All
What is the state-of-the-practice in type-level programming?
I know Günther started this thread about monads, but I seem to
remember him having a long running problem with typeful database
programming, and I wonder if some of his problems are really in the
later area. Compared to monads,
Hi,
oh boy it took me a while to find this post again.
Perhaps not exactly. I build monads left and right, but that's because
I don't understand much else. :-) Before you get all hung up on them,
though, I recommend reading The Typeclassopedia,[1], which will
introduce you to all of the
2010/3/5 Günther Schmidt gue.schm...@web.de:
When you say that you use monads to the left and right, do you mean using
pre-defined monad instances, or do you construct your own, ie. define
something to be an instance of a monad and then write codes using that
instance?
Hi Günther
One view
Stephen Tetley wrote:
To work with monads in Haskell its not ignoble simple to decide what
effect or combination of effects you want and use the relevant monad
(for a single effect) or build a transformer (for multiple effects).
... or use the free term algebra approach outlined in
