-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/29/10 20:33 , C. McCann wrote:
I suggest U+2621.
Did you mean U+2620 SKULL AND CROSSBONES there?
- --
brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allb...@kf8nh.com
system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/29/10 22:30 , wren ng thornton wrote:
On 10/29/10 8:33 PM, C. McCann wrote:
I suggest U+2621.
I'm not sure I'd've ever recognized a funny 'z' as caution sign... :)
You'd have to be a TeX / Metafont user to get that one. (The LaTeX book
Speaking of MagicHash, is it really necessary to take an operator with
potential like (#) just to keep primitive symbols separate from the rest?
At least from my 2010 Haskell learner perspective, it seems odd to create a
whole language extension/lexical change just for that purpose.
On Thu, Oct
On 10/29/10 11:18 AM, Daniel Peebles wrote:
Speaking of MagicHash, is it really necessary to take an operator with
potential like (#) just to keep primitive symbols separate from the rest?
At least from my 2010 Haskell learner perspective, it seems odd to create a
whole language
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:54 PM, wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.org wrote:
I'm sort of torn on this issue. On the one hand (#) has great potential as
an operator, on the other hand I've found that having something like
-XMagicHash (or TeX's \makeatletter and \makeatother) can be really helpful
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Ben Millwood hask...@benmachine.co.uk wrote:
Personally I think function composition is what Haskell is all about
and it is absolutely essential that the syntax for it be lightweight.
If we think using . as qualification as well as composition is
confusing, I'm
On 10/29/10 8:33 PM, C. McCann wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:54 PM, wren ng thorntonw...@freegeek.org wrote:
I'm sort of torn on this issue. On the one hand (#) has great potential as
an operator, on the other hand I've found that having something like
-XMagicHash (or TeX's \makeatletter
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:30 PM, wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.org wrote:
I suggest U+2621.
I'm not sure I'd've ever recognized a funny 'z' as caution sign... :)
Well, I'm operating under the assumption that it's one of these:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourbaki_dangerous_bend_symbol
I
On 28/10/2010 10:15, Alexander Kjeldaas wrote:
Hi haskellers.
Reading through the Haskell Prime suggestions, one that caught my eye is the
CompositionAsDot issue.
I'm especially thinking of the Pro issue:
* Paves the way for using . as the selection operator in improved record or
module
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:12 AM, John Smith volderm...@hotmail.com wrote:
On 28/10/2010 10:15, Alexander Kjeldaas wrote:
Hi haskellers.
Reading through the Haskell Prime suggestions, one that caught my eye is
the CompositionAsDot issue.
I'm especially thinking of the Pro issue:
* Paves
On 10/28/10 10:42 AM, Ben Millwood wrote:
Here's the wiki page:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/CompositionAsDot
Personally I think function composition is what Haskell is all about
and it is absolutely essential that the syntax for it be lightweight.
If we think using . as
11 matches
Mail list logo
