Jón Fairbairn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Jason Dagit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, this is basically just a zip with a special base case. But you
> > [...]
> I wonder if there is mileage to be had from persuing
> something like this, rather different (off top of head, very
> provi
"Jason Dagit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, this is basically just a zip with a special base case. But you
> can't just write it with zipWith because zipWith stops when it exausts
> either list.
>
> How about we define zipWith'' like this:
> zipWith'' _ [] _ l _ = [l]
> zipWith''
