Evening, Ben. Ben Rudiak-Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 00:46 24/1/2006 wrote:
BR> Dmitry Astapov wrote: >> http://www.haskell.org/hawiki/HitchhickersGuideToTheHaskell BR> I like the approach too, but the section on IO actions, which I'm BR> reading now, is not correct. It's not true that "a <- someAction" BR> has the effect of associating a with someAction, with the actual BR> work deferred until later. Ahem.. I got a "little" carried away on the topic of getContents, apparently :( BR> All of the IO associated with someAction happens at the program BR> point where "a <- someAction" appears, whether or not it's needed BR> later. getContents is a rare exception to this rule. But of course. Now I'll have to think how to back out of the mess I created :) -- Dmitry Astapov //ADEpt GPG KeyID/fprint: F5D7639D/CA36 E6C4 815D 434D 0498 2B08 7867 4860 F5D7 639D _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
