I agree that we should use the first round of voting to learn what the
general consensus of the Haskell community is on a logo design "idea"
(and to filter out the non-viable logos).
In the spirit of bikeshedding, I would love to see---and would
volunteer to spend part of a day editing, say, the t
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:50:51 +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 11:13:40AM +, Sebastian Sylvan wrote:
>>
>> Another reason condorcet voting is nice is that there is no need to group
>> "similar" items together.
>
>I think the plan is that once a logo "class" is chosen, we'll ha
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 11:13:40AM +, Sebastian Sylvan wrote:
>
> Another reason condorcet voting is nice is that there is no need to group
> "similar" items together.
I think the plan is that once a logo "class" is chosen, we'll have
another vote for the actual colour scheme etc to be used,
> Another reason condorcet voting is nice is that there is no need to group
> "similar" items together. Condorcet voting eliminates the "spoiler
> candidate" effect, so having N almost identical entries won't adversely
> affect that "group" (by spreading out the votes for that "group" among more
>
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Benjamin L. Russell
wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 16:19:43 -0700, Ashley Yakeley
> wrote:
>
> >[...]
> >
> >I'm currently liking
> >
> >30 (specifically, 30.7)
> >58
> >61 (specifically, the second image)
> >62
>
> It would be nice to be able to specify a specific m
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 16:19:43 -0700, Ashley Yakeley
wrote:
>[...]
>
>I'm currently liking
>
>30 (specifically, 30.7)
>58
>61 (specifically, the second image)
>62
It would be nice to be able to specify a specific member image of a
group of images; for example, the second image in group 61. Current
