so I am fascinated with cool graphics at http://www.globus.org check
out the black hole 3d from Max Plank Institute and imagine ... we did it
with Haskell bindings to Globus API!!!
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Vasili I. Galchin vigalc...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
1) I think I
fft1976:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:03 PM, FFT fft1...@gmail.com wrote:
Are MPI bindings still the best way of using Haskell on Beowulf
clusters? It's my feeling that the bindings stagnated, or are they
just very mature?
What's the story with distributed memory multiprocessing? Are Haskell
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:43 AM, FFT fft1...@gmail.com wrote:
Are MPI bindings still the best way of using Haskell on Beowulf
clusters? It's my feeling that the bindings stagnated, or are they
just very mature?
MPI itself hasn't changed in 14 years, so it's not exactly a moving target.
2009/3/6 Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:43 AM, FFT fft1...@gmail.com wrote:
Are MPI bindings still the best way of using Haskell on Beowulf
clusters? It's my feeling that the bindings stagnated, or are they
just very mature?
MPI itself hasn't changed in
bos:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:43 AM, FFT fft1...@gmail.com wrote:
Are MPI bindings still the best way of using Haskell on Beowulf
clusters? It's my feeling that the bindings stagnated, or are they
just very mature?
MPI itself hasn't changed in 14 years, so it's not
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Applications_and_libraries/Concurrency_and_parallelism#Distributed_Haskell
These are all Haskell-derived languages, not libraries, right?
___
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:03 PM, FFT fft1...@gmail.com wrote:
Are MPI bindings still the best way of using Haskell on Beowulf
clusters? It's my feeling that the bindings stagnated, or are they
just very mature?
What's the story with distributed memory multiprocessing? Are Haskell
programmers
