Ashley Yakeley wrote:
Bertram Felgenhauer wrote:
This is correct according to the IEEE 754 standard, which defines
that NaN compares unequal to everything, including itself.
This is numerically useful, perhaps, but nonetheless disturbing. For it
would be helpful to expect that any type
Bertram Felgenhauer wrote:
This is correct according to the IEEE 754 standard, which defines
that NaN compares unequal to everything, including itself.
This is numerically useful, perhaps, but nonetheless disturbing. For it
would be helpful to expect that any type that presumes to be an
