Am Mittwoch, 5. Juli 2006 15:50 schrieb Simon Marlow:
> Malcolm Wallace wrote:
> > Daniel Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Cool, though the problem of exploding runtime remains, it's only
> >>pushed a little further. Now I get a 5x5 magig square in 1 s, a 6x6
> >>in 5.4 s, but 7x7 segfaulte
Hello Simon,
Wednesday, July 5, 2006, 5:50:58 PM, you wrote:
> Mutable, boxed arrays in GHC have a linear GC overhead in GHC
> unfortunately. This is partially fixed in GHC 6.6.
> You can work around it by using either immutable or unboxed arrays, or
immutable boxed array can still have large
Malcolm Wallace wrote:
Daniel Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cool, though the problem of exploding runtime remains, it's only
pushed a little further. Now I get a 5x5 magig square in 1 s, a 6x6
in 5.4 s, but 7x7 segfaulted after about 2 1/2 hours - out of memory,
I note that your solu
