Tomáš Janoušek writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 05:49:34PM -0600, Duane Johnson wrote:
>> I'm not sure I understand what is going on here, but it seems to me that
>> the following assignment of "mult = (*)" causes "mult" to lose out on some
>> of the polymorphic behavior of (*). Is
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 05:49:34PM -0600, Duane Johnson wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand what is going on here, but it seems to me that
> the following assignment of "mult = (*)" causes "mult" to lose out on some
> of the polymorphic behavior of (*). Is that right? If so, why?
This i
