This actually clears up something that's been bothering me for some
time. I've never really like syntax of types for functions with
multiple arguments. Using the same token, -, to separate both
arguments and the result seems very poor, because when reading a type
you don't know if the value
John Lato wrote:
This actually clears up something that's been bothering me for some
time. I've never really like syntax of types for functions with
multiple arguments. Using the same token, -, to separate both
arguments and the result seems very poor, because when reading a type
you don't
John Lato wrote:
Hello,
I know there are several important differences between let-expressions
and where-clauses regarding scoping and the restriction of where to
a top-level definition. However, frequently I write code in which
either one would be allowed, and I was wondering if there
Dan Piponi wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007 1:24 PM, Ryan Ingram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tend to prefer where, but I think that guards function declarations are
more readable than giant if-thens and case constructs.
Up until yesterday I had presumed that guards only applied to
functions. But I
