Hi,
How exactly do monads “solve” the problem of referential transparency? I
understand RT to be such that a function can be replaced with a actual
value.
Since a monad could potentially encapsulate any other value—say, data read
from a keyboard—doesn’t that violate the assumption of RT
On 2009 Apr 9, at 22:30, Jonathan Cast wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 21:57 -0400, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2009 Apr 9, at 16:09, Luke Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Miguel Mitrofanov
miguelim...@yandex.ru wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by that, but
On 10 Apr 2009, at 06:30, Jonathan Cast wrote:
do
s - readFile /my_file
writeFile /my_file Hello, world!\n
threadDelay 1 -- If you don't like threadDelay, just
substitute forcing
-- an expensive thunk here
writeFile /my_file s
As a function from
