Jeff Heard wrote:
>
> Jim, I'm actually not sure that time will report greater than 100% cpu
> on ubuntu hardy. (really not sure, and don't have it available right
> this moment to check). I would however try making a computation that
> will take a little longer and use the system monitor or /
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Jim Burton wrote:
> $ time ./Par +RTS -N2
> 1405006117752879898543142606244511569936384005711076
> 1.504 real,2.316 user,0.016 sys, 100.00 cpu
I don't know why it is only 100%, but you can see that the user time
is greater than real time, so everything is working
Jim, I'm actually not sure that time will report greater than 100% cpu
on ubuntu hardy. (really not sure, and don't have it available right
this moment to check). I would however try making a computation that
will take a little longer and use the system monitor or /proc to look
at your CPU usage r
Hello Jim,
Saturday, February 21, 2009, 6:17:54 PM, you wrote:
> main = a `par` b `par` c `pseq` print (a + b + c)
two things:
1) that are grouping order? may be,
a `par` (b `par` (c `pseq` print (a + b + c))) ?
2) i recommend you to use 2 *same* computations.
otherwise, it's easily possible th
Hi, I copied the program below from a reddit post of dons'. I have a dual
core laptop with ubuntu hardy and ghc 6.10.1. I can see the difference when
I run the program with +RTS -N2 but CPU always says 100%. I'd like an
example that shows >100 -- is it not showing >100 because of my timeformat
or
