[Haskell-cafe] Tool to brute-force test against hackage libraries to determine lower bounds?

2011-11-09 Thread Ryan Newton
I don't know about you, but I personally haven't found the time to cast back in time for each of my package's dependencies to find a true lower bound version. Do we have any tools that would do the following? - ask Hackage for the available versions of package foo - use cabal-dev to build

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Tool to brute-force test against hackage libraries to determine lower bounds?

2011-11-09 Thread Johan Tibell
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Ryan Newton rrnew...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know about you, but I personally haven't found the time to cast back in time for each of my package's dependencies to find a true lower bound version. Do we have any tools that would do the following? - ask

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Tool to brute-force test against hackage libraries to determine lower bounds?

2011-11-09 Thread Ryan Newton
What about dependency interactions? If you depend on foo and bar there might be versions of foo and bar that don't build together that you might not discover by varying their versions independently. Indeed. But assuming for a moment that foo bar have correctly specified their own