2009/1/27 Massimiliano Gubinelli :
> Thanks, I know LyX. Of course this is mostly personal taste but I think
> TeXmacs as a technically superior piece of software (even if it does not
> seems so at first look) and moreover the idea is also to have interactive
> sessions and I'm not sure LyX allows
Hi,
Gour-3 wrote:
>
>> "Mads" == Mads Lindstrøm writes:
>
> Mads> I have never tried TexMacs, but newer versions of LyX do seem to
> Mads> have a more modern interface than TexMacs. I do not know have easy
> Mads> LyX is to modify to your needs though.
>
> Right. And LyX has(had) support
Hi,
Have you considered using LyX ( http://www.lyx.org/Home ) in stead of
TexMacs?
I have never tried TexMacs, but newer versions of LyX do seem to have a
more modern interface than TexMacs. I do not know have easy LyX is to
modify to your needs though.
Greetings
Mads Lindstrøm
Massimiliano
Gwern Branwen wrote:
>
> 2009/1/27 Gour :
>>> "Massimiliano" == Massimiliano Gubinelli writes:
>
>>
>> Massimiliano> As far as Haskell is concerned, a good interface, would
>> Massimiliano> allow to bypass programs like lhs2tex or in general allow
>> Massimiliano> for "beautyful editing..
Gour-3 wrote:
>
>> "Massimiliano" == Massimiliano Gubinelli
>> writes:
>
> Massimiliano> Hi, I would like to "advertise" TeXmacs
> Massimiliano> (http://www.texmacs.org/) to the Haskell comunity as a
> Massimiliano> possible front-end for literate programming in Haskell
> Massimiliano
Hi,
I would like to "advertise" TeXmacs (http://www.texmacs.org/) to the
Haskell comunity as a possible front-end for literate programming in Haskell
(and GHCI interaction). TeXmacs is a system which allows the production of
documents featuring high quality typesetting (comparable to TeX) and hig
