Hi
i noticed that you often reply to feature requests by pointing to undocumented
tools/features, either already released in secret, or forthcoming. not that it
isn't
nice to have those tools, but won't you lose track of your software and its
capabilities at this rate (not to talk about your
[feature request near the end]
Hi Neil,
Documentation isn't my strong point :)
i noticed that you often reply to feature requests by pointing to undocumented
tools/features, either already released in secret, or forthcoming. not that it
isn't
nice to have those tools, but won't you lose
Claus, Stephan: I hope you don't mind me having put a link to your work at the
bottom ;)
(link below)
If someone knows of a simple way to generate a function/type list of
the standard modules, I'd love to hear about it. Generating such a
list on the fly each time is probably not an option, as
Hi,
I started to write a Vim script for the new omni-completion feature of
Vim 7. If you use Vim you might want to check it out:
* download http://stephan.walter.name/files/haskellcomplete.vim and
put it in ~/.vim/plugin
* :set omnifunc=haskellcomplete#CompleteHaskell
* press c-xc-o to complete
Hi
If someone knows of a simple way to generate a function/type list of
the standard modules, I'd love to hear about it. Generating such a
list on the fly each time is probably not an option, as it would be
too slow.
Using a recent version of haddock, the --hoogle flag gives you exactly
what
If someone knows of a simple way to generate a function/type list of
the standard modules, I'd love to hear about it. Generating such a
list on the fly each time is probably not an option, as it would be
too slow.
Using a recent version of haddock, the --hoogle flag gives you exactly
what you
Hi Claus,
Neil: is there any documentation on the output format? i couldn't find the
flag in the haddock manual, so i was surprised to see it in haddock --help;
it works, though, and does seem to generate modules with implementations
removed, and some declarations simplified?
Documentation