Hi,
bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
Currently debian stable installs ghc 6.12.1.
Is there any reason you're not using say Debian testing? The
Debian Haskell Group (of which I am one of the less active
members) is doing a magnificent job in bringing Haskell
packages to Debian in the form of proper
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 10.06.2011, 17:24 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo:
Is there any reason you're not using say Debian testing? The
Debian Haskell Group (of which I am one of the less active
members) is doing a magnificent job in bringing Haskell
packages to Debian in the form of proper
I'm wondering what the best way to maintain
the latest ghc while using debian stable.
here's what I usually do:
* install ghc from binary package,
* build haskell-platform from source.
* when necessary, get more recent haskell packages via cabal
J.W.
Hi Brian,
Currently debian stable installs ghc 6.12.1.
Testing also doesn't have the new ghc. Here's how I do it:
I have a prefix $HOME/local/haskell, where I installed the ghc binaries
(downloadable at the ghc main site.) Just use ./configure
--prefix=$HOME/local/haskell. Then use the same
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 09:51 +, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
here's what I usually do:
* install ghc from binary package,
* build haskell-platform from source.
* when necessary, get more recent haskell packages via cabal
Yes, this is definitely the way to go. You want to have the Haskell
Should I abandon the ghc debian package and install the haskell-platform ?
Should I simply build ghc 7.0 independently ?
This is the way I went; I installed the latest ghc from source, then
haskell-platform from source. Works a treat!
Arlen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Hi All,
Currently debian stable installs ghc 6.12.1.
I'd like to use the latest version of repa which is built on ghc 7.0, and my
attempts to placate cabal's complaints about the installation of various
packages isn't going anywhere.
It's not obvious to me that there's an advantage to using
