On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:00:00AM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> I saw it. In total, four messages from you in this thread.
I'm really sorry about that, but it was due to a problem and a
misunderstanding with the administrator of my STMP server: at first it
appeared the server was dropping my mail,
Andrea Rossato wrote:
I'm not even sure if this message will get through. Actually this is
the only mailing list I have some problem with... perhaps some filter
may be considering my messages as spam. I'd like to have a copy of
that filter installed on my system!
I saw it. In total, four messag
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:44:38AM +0200, Andrea Rossato wrote:
> I apologize for the noise. The auto-replay is for documentation (who
> knows, maybe others searching the list archives may find this info
> useful).
I tried to send a couple of messages to inform that the API I was
writing a binding
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 09:08:13AM +0200, Andrea Rossato wrote:
> To make a short story long, I needed some client for the Audacious
> media player, something I could use to remote control it and, since
> I'm addicted to Haskell, instead of surfing the web to find a suitable
> client I surfed the w
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 09:08:13AM +0200, Andrea Rossato wrote:
> Hi,
> I think there's a huge flaw in the Haskell design:
I don't know if this is a feature, the fact that most of the times you
can find a solution to your problems by yourself, but only after
polluting the haskell-cafe mailing lis
Hi,
I think there's a huge flaw in the Haskell design: if you conceive
such a powerful and expressive programming language, one that empowers
even the most ignorant computer user to write complex applications,
instead of sticking to basic shell scripting - the only domain
graspable by such stupid
