Tillmann,
I've been looking into you packages, very neat ideas and a nice
implementation really.
I've already implemented a toy example and it worked great. Now I am trying
to use your library in a more serious piece of code, and I've realised that
defineIsomorphisms doesn't support record
Great! That was pretty fast :)
Are you going to update invertible-syntax to use partial-isomorphisms-0.2?
2011/2/5 Tillmann Rendel tillm...@rendel.net
Hi Ozgur,
Ozgur Akgun wrote:
I've already implemented a toy example and it worked great. Now I am
trying
to use your library in a more
Dear Café,
I working on a DSL represented by a algebraic data type with many
constructors. I can write (separately) a parser and a pretty-printer for it,
and I am doing so at the moment. However, this way it feels like repeating
the same information twice.
Is there any work to combine the two?
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 04:22:00PM +, Ozgur Akgun wrote:
Dear Café,
I working on a DSL represented by a algebraic data type with many
constructors. I can write (separately) a parser and a pretty-printer for it,
and I am doing so at the moment. However, this way it feels like repeating
Tillmann Rendel and Klaus Ostermann. "Invertible syntax descriptions: Unifying parsing and pretty printing".Haskell Symposium 2010.Regards,MalcolmOn 26 Jan, 2011,at 04:22 PM, Ozgur Akgun ozgurak...@gmail.com wrote:Dear Café,I working on a DSL represented by a algebraic data type with many
Depending on your concrete syntax, you may be able to use BNFC
(http://hackage.haskell.org/package/BNFC).
/J
On 26 January 2011 17:22, Ozgur Akgun ozgurak...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Café,
I working on a DSL represented by a algebraic data type with many
constructors. I can write (separately) a
On 01/26/2011 05:22 PM, Ozgur Akgun wrote:
I working on a DSL represented by a algebraic data type with many
constructors. I can write (separately) a parser and a pretty-printer
for it, and I am doing so at the moment. However, this way it feels
like repeating the same information twice.
Is
Hi Ozgur,
Ozgur Akgun wrote:
I can write (separately) a parser and a pretty-printer [...]
Is there any work to combine the two?
Brent Yorgey wrote:
Maybe take a look at Invertible Syntax Descriptions: Unifying Parsing
and Pretty Printing by Tillmann Rendel and Klaus Ostermann from last
