* Andrew Coppin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070608 02:45]:
Bayley, Alistair wrote:
[[1]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Coppin
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
Some things to remember using Doubles:
* {-# OPTIONS -fexcess-precision #-}
* -fvia-C
* -fbang-patterns
*
dons:
sic:
* Andrew Coppin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070608 02:45]:
Bayley, Alistair wrote:
[[1]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Coppin
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
Some things to remember using Doubles:
* {-# OPTIONS -fexcess-precision #-}
*
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
Some things to remember using Doubles:
* {-# OPTIONS -fexcess-precision #-}
* -fvia-C
* -fbang-patterns
* -optc-O2 -optc-mfpmath=sse -optc-msse2
* -optc-march=pentium4
1. What do all those things do?
2. Is the effect actually that large?
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Coppin
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
Some things to remember using Doubles:
* {-# OPTIONS -fexcess-precision #-}
* -fvia-C
* -fbang-patterns
* -optc-O2 -optc-mfpmath=sse -optc-msse2
* -optc-march=pentium4
1. What
andrewcoppin:
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
Some things to remember using Doubles:
* {-# OPTIONS -fexcess-precision #-}
* -fvia-C
* -fbang-patterns
* -optc-O2 -optc-mfpmath=sse -optc-msse2
* -optc-march=pentium4
1. What do all those things do?
Check the GHC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Donald
Bruce Stewart
3) -fbang-patterns
Better than `seq`
Better in the more convenient to write sense, right? AFAIUI, seq and
bang patterns should be equivalent.
Alistair
*
Alistair_Bayley:
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Donald
Bruce Stewart
3) -fbang-patterns
Better than `seq`
Better in the more convenient to write sense, right? AFAIUI, seq and
bang patterns should be equivalent.
Yes, in the 'more convenient' sense. Adding strictness
Bayley, Alistair wrote:
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrew Coppin
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
Some things to remember using Doubles:
* {-# OPTIONS -fexcess-precision #-}
* -fvia-C
* -fbang-patterns
* -optc-O2 -optc-mfpmath=sse -optc-msse2
3) -fbang-patterns
Better than `seq`
Do you mean more convenient than or generates better code than. I don't
think the latter should be true; send a counterexample if you find one!
Simon
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
i recently saw a (yet-another) benchark comparing various languages:
http://www.timestretch.com/FractalBenchmark.html
while no haskell example was listed, i thought i would try a naive
implementation myself for comparison. it is available here:
http://www.b7j0c.org/dev/haskell/misc/time.hs
my
clawsie:
i recently saw a (yet-another) benchark comparing various languages:
http://www.timestretch.com/FractalBenchmark.html
while no haskell example was listed, i thought i would try a naive
implementation myself for comparison. it is available here:
11 matches
Mail list logo
