I while back following the most recent discussion about filepaths and IO
generally, I decided to pick up the torch and try my hand at a solution
that delt with all the issues. My conception of the problem can be
found here:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:31:20AM -0500, robert dockins wrote:
2) It is performant (mostly). At least it outperforms other Haskell IO
methods I have tried. My 'wc' is about twice as fast as the current
shootout version in informal tests (the shootout code is included in the
repo). My
2) It is performant (mostly). At least it outperforms other Haskell IO
methods I have tried. My 'wc' is about twice as fast as the current
shootout version in informal tests (the shootout code is included in the
repo). My md5 can sum somewhere between 2-4Mb/Sec on my hardware.
You know
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:40:04 +0100, Tomasz Zielonka
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, do we care about such benchmarks?
I'd say we (as in Haskell programmers) don't care, but they (as in
imperative programmers that are looking into maybe trying Haskell)
probably do.
/S
--
Sebastian Sylvan
I've been wondering lately, about the shootout results. Is there some
Haskell Language intrinsic reason that OCaml performs so well in
comparison to Haskell in the shootout (e.g. even optimized Haskell code
will allways be slower because of overhead of language features or
something like
