Conor McBride writes:
> ...seemed like a good plan. I got lots of scary warnings like
> (.text+0x51d8): warning: Using 'setprotoent' in statically linked
> applications requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc
> version used for linking
I guess the message is pretty self-explanat
Hi
Thanks for the help! I've made some progress, but I'm not there yet.
On 28 Oct 2010, at 20:08, Ketil Malde wrote:
"Sittampalam, Ganesh" writes:
Have you tried passing -optl-static to ghc (which causes -static to
be
passed to ld)?
This was new to me. I gave it a whirl. I got lots of l
"Sittampalam, Ganesh" writes:
> Have you tried passing -optl-static to ghc (which causes -static to be
> passed to ld)?
It used to be: -optl-static -optl-pthread
But it doesn't seem to work anymore on my install.
% ./a.out
a.out: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/getpagesize.c:32: __getpagesize: A
Conor McBride wrote:
> Is there some way I can get some more static linking to happen?
> I did poke about online a bit and found some remarks to the effect
> that GHC got so much more portable after switching to the dynamic
> libffi. That sounds great, but tough luck for me.
>
> So, being both
Hi again
This is what happens when you write actual for-users for-running
programs, I guess. It's been a while...
I've been writing some software with Network.CGI etc, which we
run on the deparmental web server for my students to use. But
we just had a bit of an upgrade on the system, and now (o
