John Lato wrote:
Another (additional) approach would be to encapsulate unsafeInterleaveIO
within some routine and not let it go out into the wild.
lazilyDoWithIO :: IO a -> (a -> b) -> IO b
It would use unsafeInterleave internally but catch all IO errors within
itself.
I wonder if this is a
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:08:36 +0400
> From: Daniil Elovkov
> Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] memory needed for SAX parsing XML
> To: Haskell-Cafe
> Message-ID: <4bcd6104.50...@googlemail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=f
Jason Dagit wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Daniil Elovkov
mailto:daniil.elov...@googlemail.com>>
wrote:
Hello haskellers!
I'm trying to process an xml file with as little footprint as
possible. SAX is alright for my case, and I think that's the
lightest way possibl
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Daniil Elovkov <
daniil.elov...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hello haskellers!
>
> I'm trying to process an xml file with as little footprint as possible. SAX
> is alright for my case, and I think that's the lightest way possible. So,
> I'm looking at HaXml.SAX
>
> I'm
Hello haskellers!
I'm trying to process an xml file with as little footprint as possible.
SAX is alright for my case, and I think that's the lightest way
possible. So, I'm looking at HaXml.SAX
I'm surprised to see that it takes about 56-60 MB of ram. This seems
constant relative to xml file
