On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 10:48 +0200, Ketil Malde wrote:
> Johan Tibell writes:
>
> > I agree with Don. Also, I don't think that a Unicode type should
> > mention what encoding it uses as it's an implementation detail.
>
> Right. I see from the documentation that it uses Word16s (and presumably
>
Johan Tibell writes:
> I agree with Don. Also, I don't think that a Unicode type should
> mention what encoding it uses as it's an implementation detail.
Right. I see from the documentation that it uses Word16s (and presumably
the utf-16 encoding). Out of curiosity, why was this particular
enc
By unanimous opinion the "text" library is the man.
Thanks to all who answered.
titto
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Hi Bryan and others,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> bytestring predates the other two libraries by several years. The underlying
> stream type for uvector and text are almost the same, so they could in
> principle be merged. There's a fair amount of duplication there,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Alexander Dunlap <
alexander.dun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just have a question out of curiosity - why was the decision made to
> have Data.Text, uvector, and ByteString all separate data structures,
> rather than defining the string types in terms of uvector?
>
b
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Don Stewart wrote:
> tittoassini:
>> 2009/9/28 Don Stewart :
>> > titto:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I am looking for an unicode strings library, I found on hackage:
>> >>
>> >> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/compact-string
>> >>
>> >> http://hackage.haskell.org/pac
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 18:32 +0200, Johan Tibell wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
> > tittoassini:
> >> 2009/9/28 Don Stewart :
> >> > titto:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> I am looking for an unicode strings library, I found on hackage:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://hackage.hask
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 14:16 +0100, Titto Assini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for an unicode strings library, I found on hackage:
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/compact-string
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/text
>
> They both look solid and functionally complete so ... I don't
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
> tittoassini:
>> 2009/9/28 Don Stewart :
>> > titto:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I am looking for an unicode strings library, I found on hackage:
>> >>
>> >> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/compact-string
>> >>
>> >> http://hackage.haskell.org/pac
tittoassini:
> 2009/9/28 Don Stewart :
> > titto:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am looking for an unicode strings library, I found on hackage:
> >>
> >> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/compact-string
> >>
> >> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/text
> >>
> >> They both look solid and functionally comple
titto:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for an unicode strings library, I found on hackage:
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/compact-string
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/text
>
> They both look solid and functionally complete so ... I don't know which
> one to use :-)
>
> As I am sure I
Hi,
I am looking for an unicode strings library, I found on hackage:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/compact-string
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/text
They both look solid and functionally complete so ... I don't know which
one to use :-)
As I am sure I am not the first one facing thi
12 matches
Mail list logo
