Hello,
I am very curious about the readiness of trading and banking industries
to adopt FPLs like Haskell:
http://talenteze.catsone.com/careers/index.php?m=portala=detailsjobOrderID=466095
I currently work in the computer security(intrusion detection). My
colleagues are totally ignorant
Vasili I. Galchin wrote:
I am very curious about the readiness of trading and banking industries
to adopt FPLs like Haskell:
http://talenteze.catsone.com/careers/index.php?m=portala=detailsjobOrderID=466095
I currently work in the computer security(intrusion detection).
I worked in
Trustworthiness
It provides the means of constructing systems that can be reasoned
about, in which the risks of mistakes can be assessed, in which
concurrency can be exploited without compromising those properties.
I once sat on a plane with a guy who ran a company that made software
to
Vasili I. Galchin vigalc...@gmail.com writes:
I am very curious about the readiness of trading and banking industries
to adopt FPLs like Haskell:
Yes, I've noticed that, too. And it goes both ways - it's an industry
of which the computer science crowd tends to be unaware as well.
Some
Hi Neil,
Can you go into more detail about the intrusion detection software you
wrote, e..g how it used iteratees and DSLs(even not directly impl. in
Haskell)??
Thanks,
Vasili
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Neil Davies
semanticphilosop...@gmail.comwrote:
Trustworthiness
It provides
On 11-03-25 03:08 AM, Vasili I. Galchin wrote:
I am very curious about the readiness of trading and banking
industries to adopt FPLs like Haskell:
Not only FPL and not only Haskell, but also descendents of APL such as
J. Generally also any innovation.
Why are they willing to try out
Why can they assess the risk and the probable benefits of trying out
another innovation and can contain the risk? Because they can do that of
almost anything. They are surviving investors. Trying out another innovation
is just another investment, not unlike trying out another stock, another
