I was interested to see if I could determine what was happening with this.
After some playing around, I noticed the code was running significantly
faster if I *didn't* compile it, but ran it with 'runghc' instead (running
under ghci was also fast).
Here are the running times I found. The
On 10/08/10 00:29, Pieter Laeremans wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying some haskell scripting. I'm writing a script to print some
information
from a zip archive. The zip-archive library does look nice but the
performance of zip-archive/lazy bytestring
doesn't seem to scale.
Executing :
Hello,
I'm trying some haskell scripting. I'm writing a script to print some
information
from a zip archive. The zip-archive library does look nice but the
performance of zip-archive/lazy bytestring
doesn't seem to scale.
Executing :
eRelativePath $ head $ zEntries archive
on an archive of
On 10 August 2010 09:29, Pieter Laeremans pie...@laeremans.org wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying some haskell scripting. I'm writing a script to print some
information
from a zip archive. The zip-archive library does look nice but the
performance of zip-archive/lazy bytestring
doesn't seem to
