Please, oh please, get it into GHC Head! You'll be my hero.
Regards,
John A. De Goes
N-BRAIN, Inc.
http://www.n-brain.net
[n minds are better than n-1]
On Oct 27, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Brian Alliet wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:58:11AM +, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
Is there an interest i
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Brian Alliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:58:11AM +, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> > Is there an interest in hosting GHC on the JVM (besides my own).
>
> Yep. I wrote a JVM backend for GHC (LambdaVM). It is suffering from
> bit-rot tho
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:58:11AM +, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> Is there an interest in hosting GHC on the JVM (besides my own).
Yep. I wrote a JVM backend for GHC (LambdaVM). It is suffering from
bit-rot though. I think this thread has re-spaked my interest in it
though.
> I don't think it
Is there an interest in hosting GHC on the JVM (besides my own).
There's interest but my understanding is that the GHC backend architecture is
not at all friendly to work with. That said, I hear in the next release (I
think 6.12, not the 6.10 that's in beta) will have a redesigned backend
arc
Sorry,
as Chris Eidhof replied to me CAL is not pure. I was only playing with
GemCutter, I don't use CAL so I didn't know.
Fero
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 5:32 PM, frantisek kocun
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> There is CAL language (purely functional, very Haskell like, the most I
> have seen). CAL E
There is CAL language (purely functional, very Haskell like, the most I have
seen). CAL Eclipse plugin (IDE for CAL for non java-ers) is incredible, with
support for code comletition, documentation, refactor, code navigation..
They have graphical editor GemCutter for it as well. You can use java
li
On Oct 12, 2008, at 6:19 AM, Jon Harrop wrote:
On Saturday 11 October 2008 17:45:39 John A. De Goes wrote:
I have strong interest in hosting GHC on the JVM. And I suspect it
would be good for the Haskell community, as the JVM already runs on
nearly every machine known to man, has a wealth of c
On Saturday 11 October 2008 17:45:39 John A. De Goes wrote:
> I have strong interest in hosting GHC on the JVM. And I suspect it
> would be good for the Haskell community, as the JVM already runs on
> nearly every machine known to man, has a wealth of cross-platform
> libraries, and is getting impr
>
> Are there, or have there been Haskell ports to the JVM? Are any of them
> alive and well?
>
See the thread started 9 September on "Haskell and Java":
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe/44252
Sean
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Has
There's a YHC that can compile to JavaScript, and JavaScript can be
run on Java...
Which means, practically speaking, there is no YHC backend for the JVM.
Regards,
John A. De Goes
N-BRAIN, Inc.
http://www.n-brain.net
[n minds are better than n-1]
On Oct 11, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Brandon S. Al
On 2008 Oct 11, at 12:07, David Leimbach wrote:
Are there, or have there been Haskell ports to the JVM? Are any of
them alive and well?
YHC, last I heard, was alive and well and there's a YHC Core backend
for the JVM.
Is there an interest in hosting GHC on the JVM (besides my own).
The
LamdaVM was the only full-fledged effort to port Haskell to the JVM,
and like most graduate school projects, the project is now dead.
I have strong interest in hosting GHC on the JVM. And I suspect it
would be good for the Haskell community, as the JVM already runs on
nearly every machine
12 matches
Mail list logo
