Wow, amazing :)
How long did it take you to write this little nice example? Examples like this
are really welcome. It will take me a while to decipher, but that's the fun of
Haskell, it's an endless learning experience!
Here's a thought: I hardly know Haskell, but I can already write some cod
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 17:24 +0100, Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
> Derek Elkins wrote:
> > Implicit parameters add an extra argument to a function conceptually.
> > What you need is to "add an argument" to "SF" which implicit parameters
> > don't know how to do since SF is just some data structure. One
Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
Derek Elkins wrote:
you can
use an equivalent Reader/Environment arrow transformer.
Nice, I did not know that monad yet, thanks!
But can it be combined together with the arrows do/proc syntax? How
would that look like?
Something like this?
8<
module M
Derek Elkins wrote:
Implicit parameters add an extra argument to a function conceptually.
What you need is to "add an argument" to "SF" which implicit parameters
don't know how to do since SF is just some data structure. One way to
deal with this is the way you deal with the same problem in Hask
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 23:44 +0100, Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
> If I understand it correctly, implicit parameters in Haskell allow you
> to pass values to functions with explicitly adding a parameter to each
> of the functions being “called” (I appologize for my imperative
> terminology here. How wou
