| An interesting critique of OCaml.
|
| http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/2008/05/07/why-ocaml-sucks/
Interesting to me is that my pet ocaml peeve is not there: namely the
lack of convenient operator overloading. Admittedly I only used ocaml
for 6 months, but I never adapted to needing to write
Actually, it's (+) for ints and (+.) for floats. Which kind of proves your
point.
Mike
Tim Docker wrote:
| An interesting critique of OCaml.
|
| http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/2008/05/07/why-ocaml-sucks/
Interesting to me is that my pet ocaml peeve is not there: namely the
lack of
