Correction - I wrote:
If you want a GUI for configuration, you could,
for example, write a fairly simple transformation
of the master XML into a .NET dialog, or glade
file for GTK, or whatever. We never did that,
though.
Actually, Yael Weinbach wrote a beautiful GUI
for this configuration
On 12 sept. 05, at 00:50, Ralf Lammel wrote:- XML wasn't mentioned in your message. I wonder whether they discuss itin the actual thread. (Yes, you might be saying XML is not the sameYes, fowler mentionned XML: "XML has its uses, but isn't exactly easy to read. We could make it easier to see
Yoann,
Thanks for your comments.
Yoann wrote: I dont think XML is a good idea
for files that are managed/edited by humans.
I think the users prefer simpler files with a custom
syntax, and the user is the king.
I dont mind, but when you say user do you mean application
Ralf Lammel wrote:
XML... I wonder whether they discuss it...
yoann padioleau wrote:
Yes, fowler mentionned XML: XML has its uses,
but isn't exactly easy to read... I dont think
XML is a good idea for files that are
managed/edited by humans.
It can be very human readable if set up
Yoel Jacobsen writes:
It seems that Martin Fowler's article Language Workbenches: The
killer-App for Domain Specific Languages? -
http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/languageWorkbench.html - has
generated some nice dynamic solution where a configuration file is
written in the same
On 08/09/05, Yoel Jacobsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that Martin Fowler's article Language Workbenches: The
killer-App for Domain Specific Languages? -
http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/languageWorkbench.html - has
generated some nice dynamic solution where a configuration file is
Hi Yoel,
This looks like fun.
Just some general comments:
- One should try to *also* provide a simple solution. Here I would pick
a solution that doesn't need a lot of explanation (of Haskell and the
solution) and a lot of defense to score with it.
- As a second step, one should identify a
