On 30 December 2004 05:25, Philippa Cowderoy wrote:
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, John Goerzen wrote:
But like I've said, I am willing to negotiate with people that
require code under a license that lets them use it without releasing
the code. I have also stated that I will put any part of the code
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are already a couple of bits of (L)GPL under fptools: GMP and
readline. GMP we'd like to replace because it is necessarily a part of
every compiled Haskell program; readline isn't so important but it would
be nice to have a BSD-licensed
On 06 January 2005 12:20, Ketil Malde wrote:
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are already a couple of bits of (L)GPL under fptools: GMP and
readline. GMP we'd like to replace because it is necessarily a part
of every compiled Haskell program; readline isn't so important but
it
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 04:38:01AM +, Mark Carroll wrote:
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, John Goerzen wrote:
(snip)
I accept patches for things like this for MissingH. You can send me
code or diffs as you prefer. I've been accepting code licensed under
GPL, LGPL, or BSD, and will need a
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, John Goerzen wrote:
In which case, it will fall under the default (GPL) license of the
library (and may later be given to fptools to be part of the standard
library).
I would've thought the GPL was incompatible with being part of a standard
library intended for use in
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 12:02:58AM +, Philippa Cowderoy wrote:
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, John Goerzen wrote:
In which case, it will fall under the default (GPL) license of the
library (and may later be given to fptools to be part of the standard
library).
I would've thought the GPL was
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, John Goerzen wrote:
(snip)
I accept patches for things like this for MissingH. You can send me
code or diffs as you prefer. I've been accepting code licensed under
GPL, LGPL, or BSD, and will need a statement such as:
(snip)
Can you mix in BSD code with GPL, though,
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 05:24:38AM +, Philippa Cowderoy wrote:
This is the bit I was worried about, the idea of GPLed library code in
fptools disturbs me somewhat.
I don't think anyone is suggesting doing that. I'm not, anyway. I
don't think the fptools maintainers would accept it if I
