On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that I have *no idea* how to begin debugging this. In
C, Python, or any other imperative language, I'd put traces in, etc.
But in Haskell, I don't even know where to start.
One of the standard modules is
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
That's odd, it seems to be saying it's not installed at all! Hmm, no -
I did a cabal install --user (because Vista doesn't let me do
site-wide installs), looks like cabal list doesn't pick up user
installs.
Hmm, cabal
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that I have *no idea* how to begin debugging this.
I've had great success debugging a large program by loading the Main
module into ghci after setting GHC extensions, changing the search
path, and setting
On 2009-09-28 22:53 -0400 (Mon), John D. Ramsdell wrote:
I've had great success debugging a large program by loading the Main
module into ghci after setting GHC extensions, changing the search
path, and setting break on errors. If you then place calls to the
error function at the right
2009/9/27 Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com:
I'm still playing round with my random dieroll generation program. In
doing so, I just hit a segmentation fault (I didn't think Haskell
could *cause* a segfault!) I'm sure it's my code - I got this to
compile by fiddling with types until the errors
2009/9/27 andy morris a...@adradh.org.uk:
mersenne-random uses the FFI, so it's probably that. I just ran your
code with mersenne-random-1.0 and didn't get a segfault. What version
are you using?
Not entirely sure, I just did a cabal install a short while back.
cabal list mersenne
Warning:
Am Sonntag 27 September 2009 22:02:45 schrieb andy morris:
mersenne-random uses the FFI, so it's probably that. I just ran your
code with mersenne-random-1.0 and didn't get a segfault.
Yup, works here, too. And everything but mersenne-random should be fool-proof.
What version are you using?
