tpledger:
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
[...]
While we're here we should fix:
chameneos
And anything else you want to take a
look at.
A community page has been set up to
which you can submit improved entries:
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Great_language_shootout
[...]
Hello Isaac,
Saturday, November 11, 2006, 5:56:57 AM, you wrote:
2) Some Haskell programs were pushed into 'interesting alternative
implementations' because they'd strayed so far from the spirit of the
benchmark. (It takes a while for people to notice and complain, but
eventually they do.)
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:44:15 +0100, Donald Bruce Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So back in January we had lots of fun tuning up Haskell code for the
Great Language Shootout[1]. We did quite well at the time, at one point
ranking overall first[2]. [...]
Haskell suddenly dropped several
On 11/10/06, Henk-Jan van Tuyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:44:15 +0100, Donald Bruce Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So back in January we had lots of fun tuning up Haskell code for the
Great Language Shootout[1]. We did quite well at the time, at one point
ranking
Sebastian Sylvan wrote:
On 11/10/06, Henk-Jan van Tuyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:44:15 +0100, Donald Bruce Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So back in January we had lots of fun tuning up Haskell code for the
Great Language Shootout[1]. We did quite well at the time,
igouy2:
On 11/10/06, Henk-Jan van Tuyl hjgtuyl at chello.nl wrote:
Haskell suddenly dropped several places in the overall socre, when
the
size measurement changed from line-count to number-of-bytes after
gzipping. Maybe it's worth it, to study why this is; Haskell
programs
are
