On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 10:31 +0100, Udo Stenzel wrote:
Neil Mitchell wrote:
As others have said though, I wouldn't worry overly about it. The
whole concept of static linking being wrong, but dynamic linking being
fine, when you can flip between the modes just by changing compiler,
is just
On Wed, 2007-07-03 at 11:11 +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
Once GHC supports dynamic linking on linux windows (as it does
currently on OSX) I think people will stop worrying/complaining.
About this issue. ;)
--
Michael T. Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: Any people who think that
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 03:00 +, Neil Mitchell wrote:
The whole concept of static linking being wrong, but dynamic linking
being fine, when you can flip between the modes just by changing
compiler, is just silly. You don't infringe (or uninfringe) copyright
with a command line flag.
Just
Kirsten Chevalier wrote:
I am not a lawyer, but there are a couple of important points getting
missed in this thread:
[...]
That's just silly isn't a defense.
[...]
and thus trust me, we're not going to sue you isn't the answer they're
looking for, even if it's a completely accurate
Neil Mitchell wrote:
As others have said though, I wouldn't worry overly about it. The
whole concept of static linking being wrong, but dynamic linking being
fine, when you can flip between the modes just by changing compiler,
is just silly. You don't infringe (or uninfringe) copyright with a
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 14:07 -0300, Alex Queiroz wrote:
Hallo,
Gtk2Hs and HDBC are both LGPL licensed, but aren't they always
static linked? Is there a way to use them in closed-source programs?
Well let me put it this way: I'm not going to sue you and I doubt any of
the other
Hallo,
On 3/5/07, Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're really worried (but I wouldn't be) then do recall that the
static linking thing only requires that the end user be able to relink
with a different version that preserves the same ABI. So you don't have
to provide source for
Hi
Gtk2Hs and HDBC are both LGPL licensed, but aren't they always
static linked? Is there a way to use them in closed-source programs?
If you are concerned about static linking, Yhc may offer a solution,
since it produces bytecode files, which don't statically link to
anything. Of
On 3/5/07, Neil Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As others have said though, I wouldn't worry overly about it. The
whole concept of static linking being wrong, but dynamic linking being
fine, when you can flip between the modes just by changing compiler,
is just silly. You don't infringe (or
(3) The GPL has never been tested in court
http://www.fsf.org/news/wallace-vs-fsf
note that during this thread there was a note from a contributor
to promise to not sue a potentially infriging use. you should be
careful of such promises, particularly considering that some fsf
licenses include
brad clawsie on 2007-03-05 20:30:24 -0800:
(3) The GPL has never been tested in court
http://www.fsf.org/news/wallace-vs-fsf
note that during this thread there was a note from a contributor
to promise to not sue a potentially infriging use. you should be
careful of such promises,
11 matches
Mail list logo
