On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 08:51 -0800, Anish Muttreja wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:46:19 -0800, Derek Elkins derek.a.elk...@gmail.com
wrote:
The old wiki had an excellent page that has not been replicated either
verbatim or in spirit in the new wiki.
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 16:11 +0100, Ketil Malde wrote:
One wart that was briefly mentioned during the Great Monoid Naming
Thread of 2009 is the need to wrap types in newtypes to provide multiple
instances of the same class with different semantics -- the archetypical
example being Integer as a
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org wrote:
I was just wondering if not phantom types might serve here as an
alternative way to go about that. Here's a small example illustrating
it:
...
*Monoids mconcat [1,2::Foo Additive]
Foo 3
*Monoids mconcat [1,2::Foo
