On 30/10/2012, at 5:56 PM, Alexander Solla wrote:
For example, I generally prefer using the combinators directly when dealing
with functors, applicatives, and monads. This can be written wide, but it
can also be written in the style of:
f' = f $ (a = g)
* (b = h)
* (c
I wonder if people who like one giant window maybe don't use the REPL?
I keep 3 windows open: one with the editor, one with ghci, and one
with a shell. The shell I use for compiles, darcs records, diffs,
grepping, moving files around, etc. I don't understand how people are
able work with
Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder if people who like one giant window maybe don't use the REPL?
I keep 3 windows open: one with the editor, one with ghci, and one
with a shell.
[...]
I've tried with 3 terminals but I can never figure out what to do
with the extra ones.
Besides
2012/10/29 MightyByte mightyb...@gmail.com:
The ideal line length for text layout is based on the physiology of
the human eye… At normal reading distance the arc of the visual field
is only a few inches – about the width of a well-designed column of
text, or about 12 words per line. Research
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:20:20PM +0530, Rustom Mody wrote:
There was a recent discussion on the python list regarding maximum line
length.
It occured to me that beautiful haskell programs tend to be plump (ie have
long lines) compared to other languages whose programs are 'skinnier'.
My
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Iustin Pop ius...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:20:20PM +0530, Rustom Mody wrote:
There was a recent discussion on the python list regarding maximum line
length.
It occured to me that beautiful haskell programs tend to be plump (ie
have
It is kind of ironic that the wide code examples in the blog post are wrapped
at 65 chars by the blog formatting.
Regards,
Malcolm
On 29 Oct 2012, at 11:50, Rustom Mody wrote:
There was a recent discussion on the python list regarding maximum line
length.
It occured to me that
* Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com [2012-10-29 17:20:20+0530]
There was a recent discussion on the python list regarding maximum line
length.
It occured to me that beautiful haskell programs tend to be plump (ie have
long lines) compared to other languages whose programs are 'skinnier'.
My
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Malcolm Wallace malcolm.wall...@me.comwrote:
It is kind of ironic that the wide code examples in the blog post are
wrapped at 65 chars by the blog formatting.
Regards,
Malcolm
Well that goes to underscore a couple of points:
1. The fixed 80 char width
I'm not viewing on a narrow device, and I see the wrapped (and the whole
post confined to the centre of the screen).
I certainly don't use an 80-column limit any more. I use the rule:
A function must be completely visible in my editor on my screen. (but this
is only a good rule if most people
Colin Adams colinpaulad...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not viewing on a narrow device, and I see the wrapped (and the
whole
post confined to the centre of the screen).
I certainly don't use an 80-column limit any more. I use the rule:
A function must be completely visible in my editor on my screen.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Colin Adams colinpaulad...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm not viewing on a narrow device, and I see the wrapped (and the whole
post confined to the centre of the screen).
I certainly don't use an 80-column limit any more. I use the rule:
A function must be completely
On 10/29/2012 07:50 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
There was a recent discussion on the python list regarding maximum line
length.
It occured to me that beautiful haskell programs tend to be plump (ie
have long lines) compared to other languages whose programs are 'skinnier'.
My thoughts on this are
If I find my line is longer than 80 characters, I just shorten my
function and variable names!
It's perfectly idio(ma)tic!
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
On 10/29/2012 07:50 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
There was a recent discussion on the python list
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.comwrote:
On 10/29/2012 07:50 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
There was a recent discussion on the python list regarding maximum line
length.
It occured to me that beautiful haskell programs tend to be plump (ie
have long lines)
I stick to 80 columns fairly rigidly. This is not only so that it fits
into narrow windows, but also so that any two subexpressions in the
same expression tend to be close together on my screen, which makes it
easier for me to reason about it. If only it was easy for me to read
and write code on a
On 10/29/2012 10:28 AM, Alexander Solla wrote:
In any language, a line longer than 80 characters usually (but not
always) suggests that you might want to stop and rethink your design. In
many cases a refactoring or two will greatly simplify the code and
reduce your line
I also stick to a pretty rigid 78 characters. Doing so actually helps
me fit more code onto my screen at a time because I usually have two
or three columns of open files side by side. I find that I need this
more often than I need to see a single function on a page (thanks to
Haskell's
I would prefer to completely ignore line lengths when writing Haskell.
In general, giving good names to things in where-clauses automatically
keeps my code short enough.
My opinion is that different people like different code layouts, and
when formatting code in certain ways, we will always have
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:50:57PM +, Niklas Hambüchen wrote:
I would prefer to completely ignore line lengths when writing Haskell.
In general, giving good names to things in where-clauses automatically
keeps my code short enough.
My opinion is that different people like different
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Alexander Solla alex.so...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.comwrote:
On 10/29/2012 07:50 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
There was a recent discussion on the python list regarding maximum line
length.
It occured
: MightyByte mightyb...@gmail.com
An: Jake McArthur jake.mcart...@gmail.com
CC: Haskell Cafe haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Betreff: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Optimal line length for haskell
I also stick to a pretty rigid 78 characters. Doing so actually helps
me fit more code onto my screen at a time because I
-cafe@haskell.org
Betreff: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Optimal line length for haskell
I also stick to a pretty rigid 78 characters. Doing so actually helps
me fit more code onto my screen at a time because I usually have two
or three columns of open files side by side. I find that I need this
more
On 30/10/2012, at 3:28 AM, Alexander Solla wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com
wrote:
In any language, a line longer than 80 characters usually (but not
always) suggests that you might want to stop and rethink your design. In
many cases a
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz wrote:
On 30/10/2012, at 3:28 AM, Alexander Solla wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com
wrote:
In any language, a line longer than 80 characters usually (but not
always) suggests
25 matches
Mail list logo
