Another way to get glade on Windows is to download mono, which contains both
gtk and glade.
One advantage of getting it this way is you then have mono at your disposal
for benchmarking ghc ;-) (Not that you'd benchmark a gui app, but it seems
there are many people who still think that comparing ha
2007/8/9, Peter Verswyvelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yeah I tried that one, but only the runtime, because I assumed that glade
> would be part of it, but I could not find it. I guess I should install the
> development version. Windows users look differently at these things, they
> expect all tools
Radosław Grzanka wrote:
The google knows??
http://gladewin32.sourceforge.net/modules/news/
Ah - most optimal...
Now finally I can try Glade. :-D
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskel
eeper.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Radoslaw Grzanka
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 10:22 PM
To: Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Pure functional GUI
2007/8/9, Peter Verswyvelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I
2007/8/9, Peter Verswyvelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Indeed - the *hard* part seems to be figuring out how to run Glade on
> Windoze...
>
> I did not dare to ask this question because I could not believe this was
> hard... So anybody know how to do this? Run Glade on Window$?
The google knows??
ht
TED] On Behalf Of Andrew Coppin
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 7:31 PM
To: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Pure functional GUI
Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 08:59 +0800, Hugh Perkins wrote:
>
>> uestion on using gtk from haskell: how easy is it to in
Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 08:59 +0800, Hugh Perkins wrote:
uestion on using gtk from haskell: how easy is it to integrate
with glade? ie, can we directly bind glade form elements to haskell
variables? How easy is it to bind events to glade form elements from
within Haskell?
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 08:59 +0800, Hugh Perkins wrote:
> To be fair, GTK is pretty standard. This is so even for "big name"
> gc'd imperative languages such as C#. Sure, you can use Windows.Forms
> in C#, but you often wouldnt, because of the patent burden.
> Also, gtk in partnership with glade r
On 8/9/07, Marc Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -- load up the glade file
> dialogXmlM <- xmlNew "simple.glade"
> let dialogXml = case dialogXmlM of
>(Just dialogXml) -> dialogXml
>Nothing -> error "can't find the glade file \"simple.g
>Other question on using gtk from haskell: how easy is it to integrate
>with glade? ie, can we directly bind glade form elements to haskell
>variables? How easy is it to bind events to glade form elements from
>within Haskell?
Download the source and have a look at the demo/glade
To be fair, GTK is pretty standard. This is so even for "big name" gc'd
imperative languages such as C#. Sure, you can use Windows.Forms in C#, but
you often wouldnt, because of the patent burden. Also, gtk in partnership
with glade rocks!
How easy is gtk to use from haskell by the way? In gc'
FranTk, Haggis, Fudgets, Object I/O for Haskell, Gadgets, Pictures, HTk,
Haskell Tk, HToolkit, Gtk+HS, Gtk2Hs, wxHaskell, FunctionalForms, ..
and no, that list is not exhaustive by any means (you can find abstracts
for some of these in old haskell community reports, but a lot of functional
gui l
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:22:41PM +, Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
> Well, if you want to make it as big as QT, yes.
>
> But even just a simple purely functionaly GUI framework that is part of the
> library would be nice, because right now it gives the impression it cannot be
> done in Haskell..
On Aug 8, 2007, at 3:14 PM, Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
So could you please tell me more about the problem with pure
functional GUIs and why this is not part of the Haskell library? I
mean a GUI library completely written in Haskell, not wrapping a
popular library.
I had quite a lot of expe
.
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Duncan Coutts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: woensdag, augustus 8, 2007 09:36 PM
>Aan: 'Peter Verswyvelen'
>CC: 'Donn Cave', haskell-cafe@haskell.org
>Onderwerp: re: [Haskell-cafe] Pure functional GUI (was
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 19:14 +, Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
> So could you please tell me more about the problem with pure
> functional GUIs and why this is not part of the Haskell library? I
> mean a GUI library completely written in Haskell, not wrapping a
> popular library.
Partly because just
As a newbie (okay I will not write this again, you all know I'm a newbie by now
;-), I don't understood what the problem of a pure functional GUI is.
To me, having an imperative background, a graphical application is just a big
tree of data that evolves when events from the OS come in. (this dat
17 matches
Mail list logo
