On Jul 27, 2009, at 6:30 PM, Benjamin L.Russell wrote:
Incidentally, just for the record, in response to my forwarding your
claim, Alan Kay, the inventor of Smalltalk, just refuted your
refutation [1] (see
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/beginners/2009-July/006331.html)
;
_viz._:
On 28/07/2009, at 11:35 AM, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
It's true that the abstract speaks of a more biological
scheme of protected universal cells interacting only through
messages that could mimic any desired behavior, but that's
basically _it_ for biology, if we are to believe Kay, and
even then,
On Jul 28, 2009, at 2:25 PM, Peter Gammie wrote:
But Richard (or am I arguing with Kay?) - monads don't interact.
You're arguing with Alan Kay here: the reference to Leibniz
was his. The key link here is (Wikipedia): Leibniz allows
just one type of element in the build of the universe
On 28/07/2009, at 12:59 PM, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
On Jul 28, 2009, at 2:25 PM, Peter Gammie wrote:
But Richard (or am I arguing with Kay?) - monads don't interact.
You're arguing with Alan Kay here: the reference to Leibniz
was his. The key link here is (Wikipedia): Leibniz allows
just
Richard O'Keefe wrote:
On Jul 15, 2009, at 5:25 PM, Benjamin L.Russell wrote:
it interesting that you should use the biological term disease;
according to a post [1] entitled Re: Re: Smalltalk Data Structures
and Algorithms, by K. K. Subramaniam, dated Mon, 29 Jun 2009
11:25:34 +0530, on the
Richard O'Keefe wrote:
On Jul 15, 2009, at 5:25 PM, Benjamin L.Russell wrote:
it interesting that you should use the biological term disease;
according to a post [1] entitled Re: Re: Smalltalk Data Structures
and Algorithms, by K. K. Subramaniam, dated Mon, 29 Jun 2009
11:25:34 +0530, on the
On Jul 15, 2009, at 5:25 PM, Benjamin L.Russell wrote:
it interesting that you should use the biological term disease;
according to a post [1] entitled Re: Re: Smalltalk Data Structures
and Algorithms, by K. K. Subramaniam, dated Mon, 29 Jun 2009
11:25:34 +0530, on the squeak-beginners mailing
