On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 11:49:45PM +0100, Peter Simons wrote:
Plus, powerful abstractions that make the code look simple
and elegant _always_ come at a price. An Arrow-based stream
processor that performs the same task as my monadic BlockIO
library does, for instance, results in a module that
On Saturday 06 November 2004 08:36 am, you wrote:
snip
It might be an immense project, but I also think it would be interesting.
I wonder if Haskell would be much faster after being restructured around
arrows.
If an arrow-based version of Haskell existed, I'd love to try it.
I think
On Saturday 06 November 2004 05:49 pm, Peter Simons wrote:
Since I have been experimenting with Arrows quite a bit just
recently, I feel compelled to add something to the
discussion.
I too think that Arrow are a beautifully simple and elegant
concept. However, once you write production
