Hm, don't think so, you have to build for a new platform -
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Porting
D
On 30/08/2009, at 2:10 AM, David Leimbach wrote:
Well if I build GHC on Leopard from HEAD and then copy it to Snow
Leopard would that not work?
Dave
On Sat, Aug 29,
Well the old binaries for Leopard already work on Snow Leopard. The problem
is the code generated by the GHC compiler doesn't create correct 64bit code
when invoking gcc, and gcc on Snow Leopard defaults to 64bit code now. The
solution is to use -m32 in the invocation of gcc by default for Snow
How I can tell gcc to generate 32 bit code? I've tried to set CFLAGS=-
m32, but it doesn't work.
Cheers,
D
On 31/08/2009, at 12:06 AM, David Leimbach wrote:
Well the old binaries for Leopard already work on Snow Leopard. The
problem is the code generated by the GHC compiler doesn't create
If it is closed, it is fixed in the HEAD.
Any ideas how to get hold of a copy of HEAD, when my Haskell compiler
currently outputs rubbish?
Bob
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
Here - http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building, but it won't
help, cause you need working ghc to build ghc.
D
On 29/08/2009, at 6:33 PM, Thomas Davie wrote:
If it is closed, it is fixed in the HEAD.
Any ideas how to get hold of a copy of HEAD, when my Haskell
compiler
Hi,
If you compile with:
-opta -m32 -optl -m32
Then you can get GHC to produce binaries again.
WARNING: currently you cannot use this trick to build a Snow Leopard
compatible GHC using the HEAD snapshot at
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/d ist/, because the most
recent (20090828) does
Well if I build GHC on Leopard from HEAD and then copy it to Snow Leopard
would that not work?
Dave
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Dmitri Sosnik dim...@gmail.com wrote:
Here - http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building, but it won't
help, cause you need working ghc to build ghc.
D
My 6.10.1 install still works alright after upgrade to 10.6/Snow
Leopard. What version did you have?
-Ross
On Aug 28, 2009, at 7:15 PM, David Leimbach wrote:
Just thought I'd point out that my old GHC install is now broken by
the update to Snow Leopard.
Dave
6.10.4. Did you try to build any binaries? It doesn't produce correct
assembly code (it looks like).
Dave
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Ross Mellgren rmm-hask...@z.odi.ac wrote:
My 6.10.1 install still works alright after upgrade to 10.6/Snow Leopard.
What version did you have?
-Ross
I did a trivial compile and it worked yes (the binary it produced was
alright, also). Did the binary it generate have problems, or was it
the compilation that failed?
-Ross
On Aug 28, 2009, at 7:57 PM, David Leimbach wrote:
6.10.4. Did you try to build any binaries? It doesn't produce
The compilation failed.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Ross Mellgren rmm-hask...@z.odi.ac wrote:
I did a trivial compile and it worked yes (the binary it produced was
alright, also). Did the binary it generate have problems, or was it the
compilation that failed?
-Ross
On Aug 28, 2009,
The same here:
$ghc hw.hs
/var/folders/1J/1JKije6yHpm78qqdjF5N2U+++TI/-Tmp-/ghc7743_0/
ghc7743_0.s:1357:0:
suffix or operands invalid for `push'
/var/folders/1J/1JKije6yHpm78qqdjF5N2U+++TI/-Tmp-/ghc7743_0/
ghc7743_0.s:1401:0:
suffix or operands invalid for `push'
...
I've tried to
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Dmitri Sosnik dim...@gmail.com wrote:
The same here:$ghc hw.hs
/var/folders/1J/1JKije6yHpm78qqdjF5N2U+++TI/-Tmp-/ghc7743_0/ghc7743_0.s:1357:0:
suffix or operands invalid for `push'
leimy2k:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Dmitri Sosnik dim...@gmail.com wrote:
The same here:
$ghc hw.hs
/var/folders/1J/1JKije6yHpm78qqdjF5N2U+++TI/-Tmp-/ghc7743_0/
ghc7743_0.s:1357:0:
suffix or operands invalid for `push'
14 matches
Mail list logo
