Hallo,
On 4/12/07, kynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi. I can't find that post. Could you point it to me please?
It's in here:
http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/blog/2007/03/10#programmable-semicolons
--
-alex
http://www.ventonegro.org/
___
Ha
Hi. I can't find that post. Could you point it to me please?
Thanks!
kj
riccardo cagnasso wrote:
>
> The post on dons' blog about the cpu scaler is a great example on how
> haskell can easily used in the day-to-day hacking!
>
>
> 2007/4/11, brad clawsie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> i find t
kynn wrote:
> (I don't need elegant
> factorial or Fibonacci functions in my everyday work.)
I think you do. Most of your utility programs probably fit into the
simple frame of
main = interact $ unlines . map f . lines
for suitable f. Of course, f is hardly ever the factorial function, but
it
Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A serious omission in Haskell tutorials is a collection of examples of how to
> write Haskell solutions for problems that would use arrays in any imperative
> language.
> I see that arrays can be defined in Haskell, but I don't see their use as
> comput
On Apr 11, 2007, at 23:10 , kynn wrote:
rather pragmatic. I have not been able to find enough support in
Haskell
for everyday tasks (e.g. read a stream from a socket; parse it into
a simple
The stuff in Network (not Network.Socket) gives you a Handle, which
you can treat more or less lik
riccardo cagnasso wrote:
>
> My opinion is that "learnin haskell is difficult" is just for the fact
> that
> when you learn programming, you probably begin with C / C++ or some other
> procedural/OO programming language...
>
Actually, my first language was Scheme; I loved it, and I aced the cl
... I spent 10 years programming in prolog before
I tried haskell. Most of my problems with haskell are because it has a
rather opaque performance model (e.g. when should you use tail
recursion, and when should you not). But I happily acknowledge that my
experience is probably atypical. ;-)
Hmmm
On 4/11/07, riccardo cagnasso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you first language is LISP probably you find easy Haskell and difficult
pearl.
I must say I agree here. I spent 10 years programming in prolog before
I tried haskell. Most of my problems with haskell are because it has a
rather opaque
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 05:55:08AM -0700, kynn wrote:
> Perl is a large, ugly, messy language filled with quirks and eccentricities,
> while Haskell is an extremely elegant language whose design is guided by a
> few overriding ideas. (Or so I'm told.)
>
> Based on this one would think that it wou
Hi,
I'm guessing you're not doing it the right way.
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/srv/CVSROOT co SYRENE/src
By using types, you implementation becomes a lot more readable.
Being readable is not enough for being readable aloud.
And I think a lot of people here will disagree with you
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:21:41PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> On 4/11/07, kynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Perl is a large, ugly, messy language filled with quirks and
> >eccentricities,
> >while Haskell is an extremely elegant language whose design is guided by a
> >few overriding ideas.
kynn wrote:
>
> Perl is a large, ugly, messy language filled with quirks and
> eccentricities, while Haskell is an extremely elegant language whose
> design is guided by a few overriding ideas. (Or so I'm told.)
>
> [snip]
>
>
May I ask why you want to learn it so much, if you find it so ha
If you first language is LISP probably you find easy Haskell and difficult
pearl.
Hi,
my first programming language is lisp (that is, the language I am most
fluent in -- recently Common Lisp, earlier Scheme) and I find Haskell a
problematic programming language (this is a fresh experience --
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 05:55:08AM -0700, kynn wrote:
>
> Perl is a large, ugly, messy language filled with quirks and eccentricities,
> while Haskell is an extremely elegant language whose design is guided by a
> few overriding ideas. (Or so I'm told.)
>
> Based on this one would think that it
Hallo,
On 4/11/07, riccardo cagnasso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The post on dons' blog about the cpu scaler is a great example on how
haskell can easily used in the day-to-day hacking!
Just read it, it's a very nice post. I'm not afraid of math, but
it's a relief to see some code I can re
The post on dons' blog about the cpu scaler is a great example on how
haskell can easily used in the day-to-day hacking!
2007/4/11, brad clawsie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
i find that don's "haskell hacking blog" has been written with the daily
hacker in mind:
http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/blog<
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 05:55:08AM -0700, kynn wrote:
>
> Perl is a large, ugly, messy language filled with quirks and eccentricities,
> while Haskell is an extremely elegant language whose design is guided by a
> few overriding ideas. (Or so I'm told.)
i find that don's "haskell hacking blog" h
-Original Message-
>From: "Mark T.B. Carroll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Apr 11, 2007 10:18 AM
>To: kynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
>Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Why Perl is more learnable than Haskell
>
>Sorry to hear of y
I am also coming at haskell from a perl background.
While there is some truth to what you say, I do think haskell can be
used for "keeping simple things simple" in a way similar to perl.
Though you have to search harder since the documentation / tutorials
seem to be more optimized for "making har
Sorry to hear of your struggles. There has been a lot of work lately on
writing Haskell tutorials but there's still a long way to go,
unfortunately, as I discovered when I tried recently to find the
collection of sample code fragments on the wiki that I'm sure are around
somewhere.
I had the advan
On 4/11/07, kynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perl is a large, ugly, messy language filled with quirks and eccentricities,
while Haskell is an extremely elegant language whose design is guided by a
few overriding ideas. (Or so I'm told.)
Based on this one would think that it would be much easier
My opinion is that "learnin haskell is difficult" is just for the fact that
when you learn programming, you probably begin with C / C++ or some other
procedural/OO programming language, so you get used to think in these ways,
and when you have to switch to functional paradigm, you find it difficou
kynnjo:
> Perhaps Haskell will never lend itself to something like a Perl one-liner,
> but still I wish that there were books on Haskell that focused on making
> Haskell useful to the learner as quickly as possible... If such already
> exist and I've missed it, please let me know.
There's some th
23 matches
Mail list logo
