Hello Anton,
Friday, April 28, 2006, 12:54:44 AM, you wrote:
> I really trying to avoid imperative approach. I do have a terribly big
> experience in imperative programming (by the way, you might know one
> application that I made about 3 years ago. It is Uni-K Sensei for
no. but may be you are
Brian Hulley wrote:
moduleOptions = ComposedOption "My module" [ModOption1, ModOption2]
moduleOptions = Option $ ComposedOption "My module" [ModOption1, ModOption2]
allOptions = ComposedOption "Name of program" [Module1.moduleOptions,
allOptions = Option $ ComposedOption "Name of program"
[
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Tomasz,
[snip]
ultimately, the main problem of all options-parsing stuff i ever seen,
is requirement to repeat option definition many times. if i have, say,
40 options, then i need to maintain 3 to 5 program fragments that deal
with each option. something like this:
Hello Tomasz,
Thursday, April 27, 2006, 4:45:45 PM, you wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:10:32PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
>> i don't like the GetOpt interface (it returns a list of options what
>> is unusable for high-speed application)
> This got me interested. I assume that you measure
