RE: Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Refactoring status

2008-01-04 Thread Peter Verswyvelen
the same is possible for Haskell - it's possible to add to code type signatures deduced by the compiler Ha! Yes, HaRe also has the facility to do this have I plugged it enough yet? :-) Sounds great! But could you add support for arrows so I can use it for my Yampa experiments? Please? :)

Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Refactoring status

2008-01-03 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Neil, Thursday, January 3, 2008, 9:57:10 PM, you wrote: Yes - I think you're wrong. I've seen non-textual editors for programming languages, and they are severely unpleasant for all but the most new beginners and restricted tasks. what sort of code you are tried to develop? visual

Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Refactoring status

2008-01-03 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello C.M.Brown, Thursday, January 3, 2008, 10:46:54 PM, you wrote: i don't use type signatures at all - this creates some problems when i wrote large portion of code and try to make it compile, but nothing more I believe type signatures are the very essence of Haskell documentation! I'd

Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Refactoring status

2008-01-03 Thread C.M.Brown
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: Hello Peter, Thursday, January 3, 2008, 11:03:58 PM, you wrote: Okay, but when using a syntax directed editor, type signatures can be automatically provided because the types are known. the same is possible for Haskell - it's possible to add to