patai_gergely:
> > > I would concentrate on the fact that when you use Haskell, you write
> > > code that is less prone to errors and bugs. When you write a program
> > > in Haskell and it finally compiles, chances are that there are far
> > > less bugs than in a program written in another language
Dear Gergely,
Okasaki's "Purely Functional Data Structures" is a treasure trove of
interesting things to demonstrate Haskell on. Especially the data
structures based on numerical representations (skew binary numbers and
so on) appealed to my mathematical side.
Matthias.
_
> > I would concentrate on the fact that when you use Haskell, you write
> > code that is less prone to errors and bugs. When you write a program
> > in Haskell and it finally compiles, chances are that there are far
> > less bugs than in a program written in another language
>
> the question is h
Any chance of renaming it to "Advocacy"?
On Jul 14, 2009, at 11:42 PM, Cristiano Paris wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Cristiano Paris
wrote:
...
Why don't we create a specific Wiki page about "Haskell advocation",
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Advocation
Cristiano
__
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Cristiano Paris wrote:
> ...
> Why don't we create a specific Wiki page about "Haskell advocation",
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Advocation
Cristiano
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.ha
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Bulat
Ziganshin wrote:
> ...
> the question is how to justify this in 1 hour. technical people don't
> buy such arguments with justification. but if it will be done, it
> would be best presentation possible
I think it's important to elaborate on this.
Why don't we
Hello Cristiano,
Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 6:01:14 PM, you wrote:
> When you create the presentation, please consider the big picture of
> Haskell, not only its technological features like laziness,
> curryfication, HOF, monadic syntax, type inference, type classes and
> so on.
> I would concentra
