Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, November 20, 2007, 6:35:00 PM, you wrote:
Using DocBook, however, has some nice advantages. For example, the
possibility to generate documentation in different formats. Something
more easily accessible (from the internet) would certainly be much more
convenient,
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 12:19 +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, November 20, 2007, 6:35:00 PM, you wrote:
Using DocBook, however, has some nice advantages. For example, the
possibility to generate documentation in different formats. Something
more easily accessible
Hello Brandon,
Tuesday, November 20, 2007, 1:15:34 AM, you wrote:
The ability to vote on packages might be interesting here. If
there's 4 HTML libraries and one of them gets lots of votes, it's
probably the one to look at first.
it can be made easy and automatic by just publishing number of
Hello Andrew,
Monday, November 19, 2007, 10:47:49 PM, you wrote:
- (And, since I'm on Windows, I can't seem to get anything to install
with Cabal...)
with ghc 6.4/6.6 and their built-in Cabal version, i never seen
problems. sorry, can't say anything about 6.8 and new Cabal
--
Best regards,
On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 13:45 +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Brandon,
Tuesday, November 20, 2007, 1:15:34 AM, you wrote:
The ability to vote on packages might be interesting here. If
there's 4 HTML libraries and one of them gets lots of votes, it's
probably the one to look at
On Nov 20, 2007, at 5:45 , Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Brandon,
Tuesday, November 20, 2007, 1:15:34 AM, you wrote:
The ability to vote on packages might be interesting here. If
there's 4 HTML libraries and one of them gets lots of votes, it's
probably the one to look at first.
it can be
