> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dougal Stanton
>
> On 05/06/07, Claus Reinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (tested on ghc/compiler/stranal/StrictAnal.lhs):
>
> Since when did GHC become NSFW?! :-O
>
> /ducking and running...
Says more about you than anything else...
**
On 05/06/07, Claus Reinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(tested on ghc/compiler/stranal/StrictAnal.lhs):
Since when did GHC become NSFW?! :-O
/ducking and running...
D.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailm
e actually using literate haskell to
check this and to have it included in lhaskell.vim if it is helpful.
claus
- Original Message -
From: "Claus Reinke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 1:28 PM
Subject: literate haskell syntax highlighting issues in vim
clearly.) The problems I'm seeing are the ugly white-on-red for
underlines, the lack of any kind of differentiation for
You can also put your cursor an those underlines and use
:echo synIDattr(synID(line("."), col("."), 1), "name")
looks like a highlighting bug alright. reduced example