Hi
Sorry to take so long: I've spent a week watching paint dry, so I can
confirm that this is more interesting.
Jon Cast wrote:
>
> Conor McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > I've always been a little bothered by the MonadPlus class: zero and
> > plus are associated (no pun intended) in
[switching to Haskell-cafe]
At 19:37 23/12/03 +0100, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 05:26:20PM +, Graham Klyne wrote:
> [1] http://www.ninebynine.org/Software/Learning-Haskell-Notes.html
Thanks, that was a nice reading :)
Thanks!
(If by any chance there's anything here that
On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 10:39:33AM +, Graham Klyne wrote:
>
> It now seems to me that (some?) Monads are kinds of Functors, generalized
> to handle the "no value" case, and also composition.
>
> This also had me thinking about sequence: is there a generalization to
> arbitrary monads that
