On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Michael Vanier wrote:
Is there any support for multi-line string literals in Haskell? I've
done a web search and come up empty. I'm thinking of using Haskell to
generate web pages and having multi-line strings would be very useful.
Do you mean
unlines [first line,
Hello Einar,
Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 6:14:44 PM, you wrote:
EK Do you plan on supporting things like HTTP where the character set
EK is only known in the middle of the parsing?
yes, it is supported, see Examples/Encoding.hs in the
http://freearc.narod.ru/Binary.tar.gz :
h -
Hello Einar,
Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 6:06:56 PM, you wrote:
My version of the packed string library does have an hGetLine. Don
Stewart was merging my version with his fps at some point, Don - any
news on that?
EK Getting a fast FastPackedString will solve the problems with many
EK
On Jan 12, 2006, at 1:34 AM, Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Michael Vanier wrote:
Is there any support for multi-line string literals in Haskell? I've
done a web search and come up empty. I'm thinking of using
Haskell to
generate web pages and having multi-line strings
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Jason Dagit wrote:
On Jan 12, 2006, at 1:34 AM, Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Michael Vanier wrote:
Is there any support for multi-line string literals in Haskell? I've
done a web search and come up empty. I'm thinking of using
Haskell to
On 1/12/06, Henning Thielemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Jason Dagit wrote:
On Jan 12, 2006, at 1:34 AM, Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Michael Vanier wrote:
Is there any support for multi-line string literals in Haskell? I've
done a web
--- Aaron Denney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we off-topic for this mailing-list?
I'd just like to respond to this:
Anyways, your shootout, your hard work, your rules,
but having rulings on what's acceptable be easier to
find would be nice.
People here have made the effort to develop
What does the Haskell type system do
with expressions such as these . . . ?
show 1
show (1+2)
The type of the subexpressions 1
and 1+2 are ambiguous since they have type (Num
a) = a. I'm under the assumption before 1+2
is evaluated, the 1 and 2 must be coerced into
a concrete type such as Int,
http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/decls.html#default-decls
http://www.haskell.org/tutorial/numbers.html#sect10.4
On 1/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does the Haskell type system do with expressions such as these . . . ?
show 1
show (1+2)
The type of the
I'm struggling with this example:
http://www.nomaware.com/monads/html/contmonad.html#example
After looking at it for the fourth time I got much more.. but still not
enough..
because there are so much new things (when beeing translated into some
kind of
condition ? thentodo : elsetodo
which is
On 12/01/06, Marc Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm struggling with this example:
http://www.nomaware.com/monads/html/contmonad.html#example
After looking at it for the fourth time I got much more.. but still not
enough..
because there are so much new things (when beeing translated into
11 matches
Mail list logo
