Hello Sebastian,
Saturday, November 11, 2006, 3:51:09 AM, you wrote:
Meassuring lines of code is certainly not perfect, but IMO it's a lot
more useful as a metric then gzipped bytes.
why they don't use word count??
--
Best regards,
Bulatmailto:[EMAIL
Hello Isaac,
Saturday, November 11, 2006, 5:56:57 AM, you wrote:
2) Some Haskell programs were pushed into 'interesting alternative
implementations' because they'd strayed so far from the spirit of the
benchmark. (It takes a while for people to notice and complain, but
eventually they do.)
Nicolas Frisby wrote:
First off, thanks for the reply.
I am accustomed to GHC ignoring instance contexts as you mentioned.
It's the mostly part that I'm curious about: mostly implies there's
some phases that don't ignore context. Is that only the checking the
type of the method definitions
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 23:26:40 +0100, Henk-Jan van Tuyl wrote:
I suggest [EMAIL PROTECTED], the GUI task force mailing list; nothing is
going on there at the moment, but it seems the most appropriate list.
Hmm... I guess I'm happy just using the wxhaskell-users list for now,
but if we do
Benjamin Franksen wrote:
Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Benjamin Franksen wrote:
Although one could view this as a bug in the offending module it
makes me somewhat uneasy that one additional import can have such a
drastic effect on the code in a module /even if you don't use
Over on comp.lang.functional ( http://xrl.us/s6kv ), Toby Kelsey is
wondering about writing a function twice that applies a function to an
argument two times...
twice' :: (a - a) - a - a
twice' f x = f (f x)
...that works for things like twice succ 0 and twice tail [1,2,3],
but the type
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
-snip-
I agree. Breaking the rules was mainly the reason for the drop.
Entries
like chameneos and fasta. Also, the other language teams kept
improving
things.
Yes, I missed that opportunity for listing things in threes ;-)
Over the year improved programs were
Hi all,
I am learning about sections and currying from SOE. There are three
functions below. The first is from SOE and the other two are my own practice
functions. Why does the third function fail?
--Test for negative numbers (from SOE pg 109). This works
posInts :: [Integer] - [Bool]
posInts
Hi Deech,
Trying some things in Hugs:
Hugs :t (+1)
flip (+) 1 :: Num a = a - a
Hugs :t (0)
flip () 0 :: (Num a, Ord a) = a - Bool
Hugs :t (-1)
-1 :: Num a = a
If you see, Haskell interprets the first two as sections, but the last
one is treated as a unary minus, inside brackets - i.e. as
On 11/11/06, Aditya Siram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
subOne :: [Integer] - [Integer]
subOne = map (- 1)
The short answer is that this is interpreted as negative unity, rather
than a section of binary minus. There are two common workarounds:
subOne = map (subtract 1)
subOne = map (+ (-1))
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, Rohan Drape wrote:
When I run this, then SuperCollider emits the error
FAILURE ew Command not found
Do you use some new feature?
No, however you may need to run darcs update, there was an error in
the OSC bundle encoder that I located writing that example:
11 matches
Mail list logo