If it is closed, it is fixed in the HEAD.
Any ideas how to get hold of a copy of HEAD, when my Haskell compiler
currently outputs rubbish?
Bob
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
Here - http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building, but it won't
help, cause you need working ghc to build ghc.
D
On 29/08/2009, at 6:33 PM, Thomas Davie wrote:
If it is closed, it is fixed in the HEAD.
Any ideas how to get hold of a copy of HEAD, when my Haskell
compiler
Dear Haskellers,
Just for info, we are currently at Henderson's Cafe on Hanover St (just
around the corner from the RCPE).
If anybody needs to get in touch:
Eric - +44 75187 28483
Dougal - +44 7814 412539
More details on the wiki if we move:
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Hac7
--
Eric Kow
Hello,
Yeah, it seems that checkM in formlets 0.6 broken. I reported the bug to
MightByte as well.
- jeremy
At Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:49:08 +0100,
Colin Paul Adams wrote:
Colin == Colin Paul Adams co...@colina.demon.co.uk writes:
Jeremy == Jeremy Shaw jer...@n-heptane.com writes:
Hi,
If you compile with:
-opta -m32 -optl -m32
Then you can get GHC to produce binaries again.
WARNING: currently you cannot use this trick to build a Snow Leopard
compatible GHC using the HEAD snapshot at
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/d ist/, because the most
recent (20090828) does
I want to choose a GUI library for my project. Some background: I'm a
beginner to functional programming and have been working through Haskell
books for a few months now. I'm not just learning Haskell for s**ts and
giggles; my purpose is to write music-composition-related code; in
particular,
Uwe Hollerbach wrote:
Here's my version... maybe not as elegant as some, but it seems to
work. For base 2 (or 2^k), it's probably possible to make this even
more efficient by just walking along the integer as stored in memory,
but that difference probably won't show up until at least tens of
Well if I build GHC on Leopard from HEAD and then copy it to Snow Leopard
would that not work?
Dave
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Dmitri Sosnik dim...@gmail.com wrote:
Here - http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building, but it won't
help, cause you need working ghc to build ghc.
D
Hi Dusan,
Am I doing something wrong if I get the following error during cabal
installation of hlint? Is there any way how to solve it?
The problem is that version 1.15 of hscolour released recently is
incompatible with 1.13 which HLint was being tested against.
I've now switched over to
Hi Jean-Denis,
Thanks for the information. Do you know how WxHaskell fits my needs? For
example, does it have good docs and examples for a beginner? Does it have
the ability to draw lines and characters on a surface? Does it have a type
of canvas which usually refers to an optimized drawing
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Michael Mosseym...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
I want to choose a GUI library for my project. Some background: I'm a
beginner to functional programming and have been working through Haskell
books for a few months now. I'm not just learning Haskell for s**ts and
Hello,
In the levmar binding[1][2] me and my brother are working on, I need a
function composition operator that is overloaded to work on functions
of any arity. Basically its type needs to be something like the
following:
(.*) :: (b - c) - NFunction n a b - NFunction n a c
where 'NFunction n a
As far as I can tell, it's because the NFunction type family isn't (at
least from GHC's point of view) invertible. Data families are
injective, but type families need not be, so it's quite fine for you
to write something like
type instance TypeFunction A = Q
type instance TypeFunction B = Q
Now
Yes, it works fine, now.
Thank you!
Dušan
Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi Dusan,
Am I doing something wrong if I get the following error during cabal
installation of hlint? Is there any way how to solve it?
The problem is that version 1.15 of hscolour released recently is
incompatible
At Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:46:42 +0100,
Chris Eidhof (formlets) wrote:
Confirmed. checkM is broken, thanks for noticing! I'll have a look
into it, I'm not sure whether it can be fixed. I was thinking of
removing all the monadic stuff from the formlets. I think this will
make for a much
Ouch! That is indeed an improvement... I don't recall all the details
of this codelet, but I think I got the seed off the net somewhere
(perhaps this list?), and it might well have been better originally.
So, brightly brightly and with beauty, I probably executed a
verschlimmbesserung. After a
Monthly statistics on the most popular Haskell applications and
libraries on Hackage. August 2009 edition now up:
http://donsbot.wordpress.com/2009/08/29/haskell-popularity-rankings-september-2009/
-- Don
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Bulat Ziganshin schrieb:
Hello Henning,
Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 7:01:24 PM, you wrote:
I hope that 'show' will not need quadratic time but will employ a more
efficient algorithm
yes, you are right
I thought a little about it. If I had to implement that in GMP it could
be done quite
Jason Dagit wrote:
I've never used it myself, but if you're going to be drawing a lot
perhaps cairo is right for you?
http://cairographics.org/hscairo/
I suspect you'll have to be self-taught here. Gtk2Hs and WxHaskell
are probably the most mature gui libs for Haskell. Yet with either
one
I have a version of this inside of the monoid library buried in the
Data.Ring.Semi.BitSet module:
http://comonad.com/haskell/monoids/dist/doc/html/monoids/src/Data-Ring-Semi-BitSet.html#hwm
http://comonad.com/haskell/monoids/dist/doc/html/monoids/src/Data-Ring-Semi-BitSet.html#hwmTo
do any better
Although this isn't a very general approach, I just submitted a
patch to GHC (not yet merged) with a gmp binding to mpz_sizeinbase,
which would allow for very quick computation of number of digits in
any base.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Edward Kmettekm...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a version
21 matches
Mail list logo
